Bioinformatics' usefulness in relation to the Bryophytes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21276/pt.2025.v2.i1.8Keywords:
Bryophytes, bioinformatics, plant evolution, genomic analysis, transcriptomics, comparative genomics, adaptationAbstract
Bryophytes, such as mosses, liverworts, and hornworts, are vital species for studying plant evolution because they serve as a bridge between aquatic algae and terrestrial vascular plants. Their haploid-dominant life cycle, basic shape, and absence of intricate vascular systems offer special insights into the evolution of plants. By making it possible to analyze massive genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic datasets, the development of bioinformatics has significantly advanced the study of bryophytes. This study examines the use of bioinformatics techniques and tools, with a particular emphasis on transcriptome analysis, comparative genomics, genome sequencing, and molecular clock research, to comprehend the evolution of bryophytes. Important new information about the evolution of bryophytes, the dynamics of gene families, and adaptations to terrestrial life has been made possible by these methods. We also discuss the challenges in bryophyte research and outline future directions, emphasizing the need for expanding genomic datasets, integrating multi-omics approaches, and leveraging advanced computational tools.
References
Fernandez-Pozo N, Haas FB, Gould SB, Rensing SA. An overview of bioinformatics, genomics, and transcriptomics resources for bryophytes. J Exp Bot. 2022; 73(13):4291-4305. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erac052
Rosato M, Kovařík A, Garilleti R, Rosselló JA. Conserved Organisation of 45S rDNA Sites and rDNA Gene Copy Number among Major Clades of Early Land Plants. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0162544. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162544
Chang Y, Graham SW. Inferring the higher-order phylogeny of mosses (Bryophyta) and relatives using a large, multigene plastid data set. Am J Bot. 2011; 98(5):839-49. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900384
Bechteler J, Peñaloza-Bojacá G, Bell D, Burleigh JG, McDaniel SF, Davis EC, Sessa EB, Bippus A, Cargill DC, Chantanoarrapint S, Draper I, Endara L, Forrest LL, Garilleti R, Graham SW, Huttunen S, Lazo JJ, Lara F, Larraín J. Comprehensive phylogenomic time tree of bryophytes reveals deep relationships and uncovers gene incongruences in the last 500 million years of diversification. Am J Bot. 2023; 110(11): e16249. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.16249
Wang Q, Zhang J, Liu Y, Jia Y, Jiao Y, Xu B, Chen Z. Diversity, phylogeny, and adaptation of bryophytes: Insights from genomic and transcriptomic data. J Exp Bot. 2022; 73(13): 4306-4322. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erac127
Wang ZO, Pollock DD. Coevolutionary patterns in cytochrome c oxidase subunit I depend on structural and functional context. J. Mol. Evol. Springer. 2007;65:485–95, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-007-9018-8
Peters K, Treutler H, Döll S, Kindt ASD, Hankemeier T, Neumann S. Chemical Diversity and Classification of Secondary Metabolites in Nine Bryophyte Species. Metabolites. 2019; 9(10):222. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9100222
Commisso M, Guarino F, Marchi L, Muto A, Piro A, Degola F. Bryo-Activities: A Review on How Bryophytes Are Contributing to the Arsenal of Natural Bioactive Compounds against Fungi. Plants (Basel). 2021; 10(2):203. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020203
Fuselier L, Bougary A, Malott M. From trace evidence to bioinformatics: putting bryophytes into molecular biology education. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2011; 39(1):38-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20458
Fuselier L, Bougary A, Malott M. From trace evidence to bioinformatics: Putting bryophytes into molecular biology education. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2010; 39(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20458
Wellman C, Osterloff P, Mohiuddin U. Fragments of the earliest land plants. Nature. 2003; 425: 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01884
Spitale D, Mair P, Nascimbene J. (2020). Patterns of bryophyte life-forms are predictable across land cover types. Ecol Indic. 2020; 109: 105799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105799
Peters K, König-Ries B. Reference bioimaging to assess the phenotypic trait diversity of bryophytes within the family Scapaniaceae. Sci Data. 2022; 9: 598 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01691-x
Peters K, Treutler H, Döll S, Kindt ASD, Hankemeier T, Neumann S. Chemical Diversity and Classification of Secondary Metabolites in Nine Bryophyte Species. Metabolites. 2019; 9(10):222. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9100222
Owens SJ, Blackmore S, Knox RB. Microspores. Evolution and Ontogeny. Kew Bull. 1992; 47(2): 336.
Wang Q-H, Zhang J, Liu Y, Jia Y, Jiao Y-N, Xu B, Chen Z-D. Diversity, phylogeny, and adaptation of bryophytes: insights from genomic and transcriptomic data. J Exp Bot. 2022; 73(13): 4306–4322, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erac127
Rensing SA, Goffinet B, Meyberg R, Wu SZ, Bezanilla M. The Moss Physcomitrium (Physcomitrella) patens: A Model Organism for Non-Seed Plants. Plant Cell. 2020; 32(5):1361-1376. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.19.00828
Rensing SA, Lang D, Zimmer AD, et al. The Physcomitrella patens genome reveals evolutionary insights into the earliest land plants. Science. 2008; 319(5859): 64-69. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150646
Xiao L, Wang H, Wan P, et al. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of gametophyte development in Physcomitrella patens. BMC Plant Biol. 2011; 11: 177 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-177
Bowman JL, Kohchi T, Yamato KT, et al. Insights into Land Plant Evolution Garnered from the Marchantia polymorpha Genome. Cell. 2017; 171(2):287-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.030
Liu G-Q, Lian L, Wang W. The Molecular Phylogeny of Land Plants: Progress and Future Prospects. Diversity. 2022; 14(10):782. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14100782.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 PhytoTalks

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License Terms
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright to their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License permitting others to share it with proper acknowledgement of the authorship and its original publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into additional, non-exclusive agreements for distributing the published version of their work (e.g., depositing it in an institutional repository or including it in a book), provided they acknowledge that the work was first published in this journal.
Open Access Policy
License
PhytoTalks is an open-access journal, allowing readers to access all published articles without registration. All articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
License summary:
This license allows others to:
-
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
-
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
Under the following terms: -
Attribution — appropriate credit must be given, a link to the license provided, and indication if changes were made.
Author Warranties
By submitting a manuscript to PhytoTalks, authors confirm that:
-
The work is original and does not infringe any copyright, trademark, patent, or other rights of third parties.
-
The work has not been published elsewhere (except as a preprint) and is not under consideration by another publication.
-
All necessary permissions for any third-party materials used in the manuscript have been obtained.
Citation Policy
When using or citing articles from PhytoTalks, proper attribution must be given to the original authors and the source, including a DOI link where available.