Dwindling Field Botanists at the Cost of Wet Lab Fundings in India: A Threat to Botanical Science and Biodiversity Conservation
Review Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21276/pt.2025.v2.i2.6Keywords:
Field botanist, , Funding, Phytodiversity conservation, Regional Flora, Molecular BiologyAbstract
India, known for its vast biodiversity and rich plant heritage, has traditionally depended on field botanists for the exploration, documentation, and preservation of its flora. Yet, in recent years, there has been a troubling decline in field botany research in India has far-reaching consequences for biodiversity conservation and ecological understanding. As funding shifts towards molecular biology and biotechnology, the critical work of documenting and preserving plant species in their natural habitats is being neglected. This trend not only hampers the discovery of new species but also limits our ability to monitor and protect existing ones. The loss of traditional botanical knowledge, passed down through generations of field botanists, further exacerbates the problem, potentially leading to gaps in our understanding of plant ecology, distribution, and interactions within ecosystems. The implications of this shift extend beyond academic circles, affecting various sectors including agriculture, medicine, and environmental management. Without comprehensive field studies, our ability to identify and utilize beneficial plant properties for pharmaceutical development or crop improvement is severely limited. Moreover, the lack of up-to-date botanical data hinders effective conservation strategies and ecosystem management plans. To address these issues, it is crucial to implement policy changes that promote a balanced approach between field and laboratory sciences. This may include allocating dedicated funding for field botany research, integrating traditional botanical methods with modern technologies, and fostering collaboration between field botanists and molecular biologists to create a more holistic understanding of plant biodiversity in India.
References
Nayar, M. P. Hot Spots of Endemic Plants of India, Nepal and Bhutan. Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute, 1996.
MoEFCC. India’s Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2020. https://chm.cbd.int/database/record?documentID=241351
Haque M. All India Cooperative Programme on Capacity Building in Taxonomy (AICOPTAX): An Overview. J-Global. 2003; 175-91-99. https://jglobal.jst.go.jp/detail?JGLOBAL_ID=200902208414144952
Prance, G.T. The importance of fieldwork in modern taxonomy. Bot J Linn Soc. 2001; 135(2): 143–149.
Ahmedullah M, Sathish Kumar C, Manilal KS. Strategies for Popularisation of Taxonomy in India. Rheedea. 2017; 27(2): 59–70. https://dx.doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2017.27.2.11
Ramakrishnan PS, Rai RK, Katwal RPS. Traditional ecological knowledge for managing biosphere reserves in South and Central Asia. UNESDOC Digital Library. 2002; pp.536. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000127005
Noss RF. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol. 1990; 4, 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x
Woodland DW. Are botanists becoming the dinosaurs of biology in the 21st century? S Afr J Bot. 2007; 73: 343–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2007.03.005
Funk VA. Floras: a model for biodiversity studies or a thing of the past? Taxon. 2006; 55: 581–588.
Dobzhansky T. Are naturalists old-fashioned? Am Sci. 1966 ;100: 541–550
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
No new data was generated or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 PhytoTalks

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and License Terms
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright to their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License permitting others to share it with proper acknowledgement of the authorship and its original publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into additional, non-exclusive agreements for distributing the published version of their work (e.g., depositing it in an institutional repository or including it in a book), provided they acknowledge that the work was first published in this journal.
Open Access Policy
License
PhytoTalks is an open-access journal, allowing readers to access all published articles without registration. All articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
License summary:
This license allows others to:
-
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
-
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially
Under the following terms: -
Attribution — appropriate credit must be given, a link to the license provided, and indication if changes were made.
Author Warranties
By submitting a manuscript to PhytoTalks, authors confirm that:
-
The work is original and does not infringe any copyright, trademark, patent, or other rights of third parties.
-
The work has not been published elsewhere (except as a preprint) and is not under consideration by another publication.
-
All necessary permissions for any third-party materials used in the manuscript have been obtained.
Citation Policy
When using or citing articles from PhytoTalks, proper attribution must be given to the original authors and the source, including a DOI link where available.