Dwindling Field Botanists at the Cost of Wet Lab Fundings in India: A Threat to Botanical Science and Biodiversity Conservation

Review Article

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21276/pt.2025.v2.i2.6

Keywords:

Field botanist, , Funding, Phytodiversity conservation, Regional Flora, Molecular Biology

Abstract

India, known for its vast biodiversity and rich plant heritage, has traditionally depended on field botanists for the exploration, documentation, and preservation of its flora. Yet, in recent years, there has been a troubling decline in field botany research in India has far-reaching consequences for biodiversity conservation and ecological understanding. As funding shifts towards molecular biology and biotechnology, the critical work of documenting and preserving plant species in their natural habitats is being neglected. This trend not only hampers the discovery of new species but also limits our ability to monitor and protect existing ones. The loss of traditional botanical knowledge, passed down through generations of field botanists, further exacerbates the problem, potentially leading to gaps in our understanding of plant ecology, distribution, and interactions within ecosystems. The implications of this shift extend beyond academic circles, affecting various sectors including agriculture, medicine, and environmental management. Without comprehensive field studies, our ability to identify and utilize beneficial plant properties for pharmaceutical development or crop improvement is severely limited. Moreover, the lack of up-to-date botanical data hinders effective conservation strategies and ecosystem management plans. To address these issues, it is crucial to implement policy changes that promote a balanced approach between field and laboratory sciences. This may include allocating dedicated funding for field botany research, integrating traditional botanical methods with modern technologies, and fostering collaboration between field botanists and molecular biologists to create a more holistic understanding of plant biodiversity in India.

Author Biographies

  • Rakesh Dwivedi, Bhakt Darshan Govt. P.G. College, Jaiharikhal, Uttarakhand

    Assistant Professor, Department of Botany 

  • Pawanika, Bhakt Darshan Govt. P.G. College, Jaiharikhal

    Assistant Professor, Department of Botany

     

References

Nayar, M. P. Hot Spots of Endemic Plants of India, Nepal and Bhutan. Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute, 1996.

MoEFCC. India’s Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2020. https://chm.cbd.int/database/record?documentID=241351

Haque M. All India Cooperative Programme on Capacity Building in Taxonomy (AICOPTAX): An Overview. J-Global. 2003; 175-91-99. https://jglobal.jst.go.jp/detail?JGLOBAL_ID=200902208414144952

Prance, G.T. The importance of fieldwork in modern taxonomy. Bot J Linn Soc. 2001; 135(2): 143–149.

Ahmedullah M, Sathish Kumar C, Manilal KS. Strategies for Popularisation of Taxonomy in India. Rheedea. 2017; 27(2): 59–70. https://dx.doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2017.27.2.11

Ramakrishnan PS, Rai RK, Katwal RPS. Traditional ecological knowledge for managing biosphere reserves in South and Central Asia. UNESDOC Digital Library. 2002; pp.536. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000127005

Noss RF. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol. 1990; 4, 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x

Woodland DW. Are botanists becoming the dinosaurs of biology in the 21st century? S Afr J Bot. 2007; 73: 343–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2007.03.005

Funk VA. Floras: a model for biodiversity studies or a thing of the past? Taxon. 2006; 55: 581–588.

Dobzhansky T. Are naturalists old-fashioned? Am Sci. 1966 ;100: 541–550

Downloads

Published

2025-07-30

Data Availability Statement

No new data was generated or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

How to Cite

1.
Dwivedi R, Chandola P. Dwindling Field Botanists at the Cost of Wet Lab Fundings in India: A Threat to Botanical Science and Biodiversity Conservation: Review Article. phytoTalks. 2025;2(2):340-344. doi:10.21276/pt.2025.v2.i2.6

Similar Articles

1-10 of 20

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.